Journal of Studies on
Alcohol
Volume 66
Number 2
March 2005
Issues Available Online
September 2006
July 2006
May 2006
March 2006
January 2006
November 2005
September 2005
Supplement 15 July 2005
July 2005
May 2005
March 2005
January 2005
November 2004
September 2004
July 2004
May 2004
March 2004
January 2004
November 2003
September 2003
July 2003
May 2003
March 2003
January 2003
November 2002
September 2002
July 2002
May 2002
Selected Abstracts
MAGNUSSON, Å, GÖRANSSON, M. AND HEILIG M.. Unexpectedly High Prevalence of Alcohol Use among Pregnant Swedish Women: Failed Detection by Antenatal Care and Simple Tools that Improve Detection
ABSTRACT. Objective: We examined the use of alcohol during early pregnancy in urban Swedish women, the ability of Swedish antenatal care to identify alcohol-related risk pregnancies and the utility of some potential tools for improving its performance. Method: Women attending regular antenatal care were randomized to regular assessment only (control, n = 156) or intensified screening (intervention, n = 147). In the intervention group, alcohol use was determined using the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview, alcohol use habits with the Alcohol Use Disorder Inventory Test (AUDIT), and biomarkers for alcohol use were analyzed. Data were typically obtained in pregnancy week 12. Results: In the intervention group as a whole, average absolute alcohol consumption during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy was low but highly variable (mean [SD] = 24.9 [50.5] g/week; 4.8 [6.0] episodes for the entire 6 week period); 22 women (15%) drank at levels exceeding 70 g/week during any 2 or more weeks and/or in a heavy episodic drinking pattern, 60 g/episode, on 2 or more episodes. The AUDIT had a moderate sensitivity (54%) to identify these subjects. Biomarkers identified subjects with somatic illness rather than high alcohol consumption. In the control group, only 4 (3%) were identified as using alcohol, indicating a probable underestimation of alcohol use by regular antenatal screening procedures (p = .0001). Conclusions: An unexpected proportion of pregnant women in urban Sweden consume alcohol at levels likely to produce adverse effects. Regular antenatal care did not identify most of these risk pregnancies. The TLFB identified pregnant women with risk use of alcohol during pregnancy who were only partly identified by analyzing prepregnancy alcohol use patterns with the AUDIT. Elevated laboratory markers likely indicated somatic illness rather than harmful drinking. (J. Stud. Alcohol 66: 157-164, 2005)
ABSTRACT. Objective: The present article evaluates the psychometric properties of the Portuguese-language versions of the CAGE, TWEAK and T-ACE questionnaires when used to identify alcohol misuse during pregnancy and compares these to historical data from the English-language versions. Also, construct validity of the Portuguese versions of those instruments was assessed. Method: Data were collected from March to September 2000 in three large public maternity wards in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sample size varied according to the analysis. An intra-observer reliability evaluation involved 95 replications carried out within a 24-48 hour period. Kappa was used as an estimator. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, whether or not each item from the analysis was excluded, and the item-rest point-biserial correlations addressed internal consistency (N = 786). For the appraisal of construct validity (n = 528), the relationship between alcohol misuse (evaluated by each instrument according to different cutoff points) and several putative underlying theoretically related dimensions (schooling, age, smoking, marital status, social support, illicit drug use, domestic violence and per capita household income) were evaluated. Results: All kappas were above 0.70. The alpha coefficients for the Portuguese versions ranged from 0.48 to 0.68, a finding consistent with studies assessing the original instruments in English. Yet, irrespective of the instrument concerned, a systematic increase was observed whenever the item on morning alcohol use (“Eye-opener”) was removed from the analysis. Regarding construct validity, most tested hypotheses were corroborated, except for the CAGE using the cut-off point of 2. Conclusions: This study confirms other authors’ findings that all but the aforementioned CAGE may be recommended to identify heavy alcohol use during pregnancy in general as well as in Portuguese-speaking populations in particular. (J. Stud. Alcohol 66: 165-173, 2005)
ABSTRACT. Objective: A low level of response (LR) to alcohol relates to a family history of alcoholism and predicts future heavier drinking and alcohol-related problems. The current analyses evaluate how LR functions within the context of a Social Information Processing Model, using 238 subjects aged 13 to 19 years from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA). Method: A structural equation model (SEM) was used to evaluate the relationship among (1) a family history (FH) of alcoholism, (2) the LR to alcohol, (3) expectations as measured by the Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire and (4) the recent pattern of drinking among parents in the home as predictors of the maximum recent quantity of drinking, the maximum number of drinks ever consumed in 24 hours and the number of alcohol problems in the teenage subjects. Results: When tested in the SEM, LR functioned as a mediator of the relationship between an FH of alcoholism and alcoholic outcome, and expectancy functioned as a partial mediator of the relationship between LR and outcome. Invariance testing revealed that the SEM performed similarly in light and heavy drinkers, the two sexes, and older versus young subjects. Both the measurement model and SEM had good characteristics of fit, and direct paths within the model explained 49% of the variance of outcome. Conclusions: Consistent with results from the San Diego Prospective Study, when tested in the more heterogeneous COGA population, LR functioned as a mediator of the relationship between the FH and alcoholic outcome. In these adolescents, LR not only had a direct relationship to alcoholic outcome but, in contrast to prior results in adults, also appeared to operate through expectations of the effects of alcohol in predicting heavier drinking and a higher rate of alcohol-related problems among teenagers. (J. Stud. Alcohol 66:174-184, 2005)
ABSTRACT. Objective: Environmental and cultural factors, as well as a genetic variant of the aldehyde dehydrogenase gene (the ALDH2*2 allele) have been identified as correlates of alcohol use among Asian Americans. However, concurrent examination of these variables has been rare. The present study assessed parental alcohol use, acculturation and ALDH2 gene status in relation to lifetime, current and heavy episodic drinking among Chinese and Korean American undergraduates. Method: Participants (N = 428, 51% women; 52% Chinese American, age 18-19 years) were first-year college students in a longitudinal study of substance use initiation and progression. Data were collected via structured interview and self-report, and participants provided a blood sample for genotyping at the ALDH2 locus. Results: Gender, parental alcohol use and acculturation significantly predicted drinking behavior. However, none of the hypothesized moderating relationships were significant. In contrast with previous studies, ALDH2 gene status was not associated with alcohol use. Conclusions: Results indicate that although the variables examined influence alcohol use, moderating effects were not observed in the present sample of Asian American college students. Findings further suggest that the established association of ALDH2 status and drinking behavior in Asians may not be evident in late adolescence. It is possible that ALDH2 status is associated with alcohol consumption only following initiation and increased drinking experience. (J. Stud. Alcohol 66: 185-195, 2005)
Alcohol in Asian Americans
ABSTRACT. Objective: Individuals with alcohol dependence are less likely to possess variant alleles of the alcohol-metabolizing genes, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2*2) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH1B*2), than non-alcohol-dependent controls. It is hypothesized that the mechanism through which these alleles protect against alcohol dependence is by causing elevations in acetaldehyde, which in turn cause an increased response to alcohol. Previous research has shown that individuals with ALDH2*2 demonstrate enhanced reactions to alcohol compared with those without this genetic variant, but evidence that ADH1B*2 is associated with a greater alcohol response is mixed. This study was designed to determine whether the ADH1B genotype is associated with more intense reactions to alcohol after controlling for the ALDH2 genotype. Method: Participants (N = 101) were Asian American college students. Each was evaluated using objective and subjective measures before and after ingestion of alcohol and placebo beverages. Results: Participants with the ALDH2*1/*2 and ALDH2*2/*2 genotypes were more likely to experience vomiting following ingestion of the alcohol beverage than those with the ALDH2*1/*1 genotype. Participants with the ALDH2*1/*2 genotype also had greater pulse-rate increases, observed flushing ratings, and subjective feelings of intoxication 30 minutes after ingestion of alcohol than participants with the ALDH2*1/*1 genotype, despite equivalent blood alcohol concentration (BAC) measurements. Among participants with the ALDH2*1/*1 genotype, there were no additional effects of the ADH1B genotype on any measures of response to alcohol. Among participants with the ALDH2*1/*2 genotype, those with the ADH1B*2/*2 genotype were more likely to experience alcohol-induced vomiting and to report feeling less “great -overall” 30 minutes after ingestion of alcohol than those with the ADH1B*1/*2 genotype. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that there is an additional effect of ADH1B*2 on level of response to alcohol, but only among individuals with the ALDH2*1/*2 genotype. (J. Stud. Alcohol 66: 196-204, 2005)